Posts tagged as:

9/11

if you see something, say something

by jackie sheeler on June 16, 2008

the campaign has been around for awhile, but these days it seems like every other bus carries an ad larger than most nyc apartments that proclaims:

“Last Year 1,944 New Yorkers Saw Something and Said Something”

and what, if anything, came of all this telling? certainly no terrorist plots were foiled, nary a bomb was defused, the lid wasn’t put back on the poison gas cannister moments before a bevy of tired midtown commuters streamed into the subway-car-cum-narrowly-averted-coffin.

a few years ago, at the most absurd height of the government-induced anti-terrorist panic, someone called 911 during the morning rush hour to report a suspicious unattended brown paper bag on a subway platform. NYPD’s riot and bomb control squads responded promptly, the subway line was shut down, the would-be passengers shooed out into the street, where they would be safe (even if terribly late for work).

the bag contained a half-eaten sandwich.

last summer, there was nearly a riot at the post office in my neighborhood when one of the postal clerks, apparently obeying the letter of the law (if not the spirit of brotherly love), saw an unattended briefcase leaning on the wall beside the PO boxes and, without making any kind of an announcement, threw it out the door and into the late harlem afternoon sunlight, where it did not sit for long. when the owner, a slight and elderly black man who apparently couldn’t hold the briefcase while wrangling his package through the bulletproof pulldown window, finished his business and turned to pick up the bag, it was gone. really gone — not only from the nearby wall where he had set it down, but also from the street where the clerk had flung it. wallet, house keys, important papers… personally, i’m not setting any bag of mine down anywhere in public unless it’s touching some part of my body: one foot slung through the shoulder strap, squeezed between my knees, on top of a foot or right in my lap. the old gent was reckless with his bag, but if he should have been concerned about the possibility of it being stolen, he certainly should NOT have been worried about it being thrown into the street like a sack of garbage.

the real problem with both of these stories, ridiculous (and funny!) as they may be, is that this is precisely how the government wants us to live these days — afraid of and suspicious of absolutely everything. spend half an hour on the subway and you’ll hear at least two fear announcements — the ubiquitous and utterly tiresome “if you see something, say something” chestnut paired with various reminders to keep your bags close and your eyes open at all times, be alert to danger at every moment.

but actions speak far louder than words, and if the MTA had a real concern i guess they’d pry those lazy-ass clerks out of the token booths and get them inspecting the stations. they’d arm the conductors and block the ends of stations so that not everybody who feels like it can stroll down onto the tracks at any given moment. (a woman was raped on the subway tracks a couple of weeks ago, just yanked off the station and down into the dark. everybody must have been so busy looking for unattended sandwich bags that they didn’t notice the son of a bitch dragging her off the platform.)

token clerks haven’t had a job to do since the MTA stopped making tokens a few years ago. they don’t sell metrocards, they don’t make change for the metrocard machine. they allegedly give directions, but as the booths are flanked by massive (and massively detailed) subway maps, no one has much to ask them. apparently, they are not allowed to read — this, i have to believe, as believing that none of them WANT to read, that they actually prefer sitting in their little fluorescent-lit booth, hands folded primly on the counter, gazing off into the distance, is too disheartening.

but that’s all the evidence i need that “see something, say something” is a load of bull.

{ 2 comments }

do you feel very safe today?

by jackie sheeler on September 22, 2006

i was going to be a little bitchy, and put the email address of the person who sent me this note. but i didn’t. i suppose s/he’s technologically challenged anyway, and clearly doesn’t know how to publish a comment on a blog (and believe me, i accept negative comments as gracefully as positive ones, and let all of them pass thru the site, though of course some i love and some not.)

so here’s an email i got this morning (though i’ve added missing spaces between the words, i obviously didn’t fix the grammatical errors):

you are an ignorant asshole who has yet to be touched by terrorism please go, and leave this country to those who love it and are willing to defend it get me off your list

and here is my reply:

i’ve gladly taken you off my list. but i live in NYC, and people i cared about died in the towers. so i guess i have been touched by terrorism. i do love this country — but, obviously, not our present administration. to me, they are not one and the same.

have a great day.

interestingly enough, this person has been on my press list for quite some time, with an aol address that appeared to have something to do with a magazine. yet when i searched for any traces of said magazine on the web, i got no results. so either it doesn’t exist, is too small to be worth a mention, the publisher/writer (whatever) doesn’t know how to use the web, or it’s a deceptive email moniker.

but what’s most disconcerting here is the idea that GWB is somehow “defending” this country when all he is doing is putting us at greater and greater risk of terrorist attacks and, perhaps, outright war (i mean, a war that we don’t start ourselves, as we seem to be preparing for now against iran — perhaps a war, for a change, fought on American soil).

i don’t feel safer than i did before 9/11. au contraire. do YOU? i would really like to hear other people’s views on this.

of course, after the attacks, no one was allowed to say that there might have been an actual reason that America was chosen for this massive operation. if we dared to mention any possible reasons, then “the terrorists have won”. but the fact remains that they didn’t set upon Paris, or London, or Budapest, or Toronto, but on the epicenter of the USA. it wasn’t random.

so why?

because of the way we bully our corporate money-comes-first-agendas across the world and punish countries economically when they don’t do things our way. i have a lot of respect for bolivia right now (they threw major corporations out of their country and got their own natural resources back, after said corporations blatantly violated the terms of a clearly stated contract). and the US response to Bolivia’s completely rational and legal actions? economic sanctions, trying to shove the corporate agenda — violations and all — down Bolivia’s throat despite the fact that it was clearly not in Bolivia’s best interests to allow the situation to continue. there’s more about this here:

http://english.pravda.ru/world/americas/02-05-2006/79715-Bolivia-0

is that what this country has come to? i prefer to think that the majority of Americans would not have chosen to go that route. unfortunately, the country isn’t, and hasn’t been for a while, controlled by the majority. it is controlled by the corporations — which, by the way, are considered “natural persons” under the law, so they have all the rights of human beings while sailing blithely above all regulations (for more on this, please check out “Focus on the Corporation”, a magnificent list serve written by Mokhiber & Weissman — http://www.corporatepredators.org/focus.html).

well, the alarm just went off, so guess it’s time to get ready for work.
yes. at a corporation.

sigh.

{ 1 comment }

what’s in a date?

by jackie sheeler on August 8, 2006

i just read about some hoopla relating to the first anniversary of hurricane Katrina. quick, don’t look it up, just say when it is.

dunno? that’s because we don’t call it by its date.

what about Oklahoma City? what was the date of that? and Columbine? and Pearl Harbor (that one you might know) or VJ Day?

so all these happenings have actual names. they are not known by the date of the event.

so why do we call the terrorist attacks of 2001 “9/11″? i’ll tell you right now that the reason this pisses me off is because 9/11 is my birthday, and is now forever stigmatized. i have had numerous people — both strangers and friends — console me over it. why? it’s always been my birthdate, how come all of a sudden it’s so misfortunate? it actually used to be cool when my dad was in the NYPD and my birthday was the same as the universal emergency telephone number.

i am lucky, though. i have some smart and loving friends. on the first anniversary of the attacks — when everybody in the fucking city was walking around weeping with a candle, vigils on every corner, certainly no room for any kind of birthday gathering (not that i’m so keen on that sort of thing, i just like having options), i went to dinner with a good and wise friend. at the end of our evening together, she quietly said “thank you for giving me something to celebrate today” (karen s., i will NEVER forget those words, and continually thank you in my heart for giving me that perspective.)

yet, do the people born on Pearl Harbor Day (12/7) get consoled about their birthdates? how about Oklahoma City (4/19) or Columbine (4/20). do they get congratulated for VJ Day (8/15)?

finally, someone has given me a rationale for this that makes sense: 9/11 was not just an attack on NYC, it was also attack on the Pentagon, and god knows where that downed plane in PA was heading. so OK, i can go along with it now, with somewhat less resentment, because there is a difference and there is a reason. still, it’s tiresome when people pat me sadly on my back over my birthday. i wish they had all seen the column that The Onion ran on the first anniversary – hilarious!

oh, and in case you’re wondering, Katrina happened on 8/29.

{ 1 comment }